Japan's Supreme Court ruled that artificial intelligence cannot be named as an inventor on patent applications, dismissing an American engineer's appeal. The court upheld previous rulings from the Tokyo District Court and the Intellectual Property High Court regarding the Patent Office's rejection of the application.

A blogger successfully defeated a copyright claim from a photographer regarding the "Parker Train Photo," taken in 1962 and published in 2000. The photographer claimed to license the photo for fine art reproductions at a rate of up to $5,000 each.

Adafruit received a letter from Jonathan F. Lenzner, representing Flux, demanding that Adafruit refrain from publishing claims about Flux's intellectual property, commercial traction, and user base. The letter also includes assertions related to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

The US Supreme Court has declined to review a ruling that prohibits copyright protection for AI-generated art. This decision follows an appeal by computer scientist Stephen Thaler regarding the copyright status of art created by artificial intelligence.

David Greene claims that Google used an AI voice that closely resembles his own without permission, leading him to file a lawsuit. Greene had spent decades perfecting his voice and was unaware of Google's NotebookLM tool until he was alerted by a former colleague.

AI has not violated copyright law but has highlighted the existing weaknesses in enforcement. Unauthorized derivative works, such as personal creations, often go unpunished in practice, especially in noncommercial contexts.