Themata.AI
Themata.AI

Popular tags:

#developer-tools#ai-agents#llms#ai-ethics#claude#code-generation#ai-safety#openai#anthropic#discussion

AI is changing the world. Don't stay behind. Clear summaries, community insight, delivered without the noise. Subscribe to never miss a beat.

Β© 2026 Themata.AI β€’ All Rights Reserved

Archive

|

Topics

|

Privacy

|

Cookies

|

Contact
πŸ•’ LatestπŸ”₯ Top
WeekMonthYearAll Time

Filtering by tag:

self-improvementClear
Ornith-1.5: From Self-Scaffolding to Self-Improvement
foundation-modelsself-improvementreinforcement-learningai-research
Tool

Ornith-1.5: From Self-Scaffolding to Self-Improvement

Ornith introduced Ornith-1.5, a family of 397B-parameter mixture-of-experts (MoE), 35B MoE, and 9B dense models trained through a self-improvement loop. The system generates progressively harder tasks, creates task-specific scaffolds containing instructions, tools, decomposition, and orchestration, then produces reinforcement-learning rollouts. Rewards optimize task generation, scaffold construction, and solutions jointly using validity, frontier difficulty, novelty, solution quality, and resistance to reward hacking. The target task success rate is 0.2, favoring problems difficult enough to expose capability gaps while still yielding successful training trajectories. Ornith reports that its 397B model scored 86.1 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and 56.0 on DeepSWE, compared with 85.0 and 59.0 for Claude Opus 4.8. It scored 86.0 on SWE-bench Verified, 92.8 on GPQA Diamond, and 80.0 on MCP-Atlas. The 35B MoE model activates 3B parameters per token and scored 68.5 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 using Claude Code and 79.0 on SWE-bench Verified. The 9B model scored 47.0 and 70.6 on those benchmarks, respectively; Ornith says its quantized Mobile version can run on iPhone and Android devices. Ornith reports that its benchmark results are averaged over five independent runs.

ornith.ai

πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯

11 min

12h ago

Ornith-1.5: From Self-Scaffolding to Self-Improvement

Ornith introduced Ornith-1.5, a family of 397B-parameter mixture-of-experts (MoE), 35B MoE, and 9B dense models trained through a self-improvement loop. The system generates progressively harder tasks, creates task-specific scaffolds containing instructions, tools, decomposition, and orchestration, then produces reinforcement-learning rollouts. Rewards optimize task generation, scaffold construction, and solutions jointly using validity, frontier difficulty, novelty, solution quality, and resistance to reward hacking. The target task success rate is 0.2, favoring problems difficult enough to expose capability gaps while still yielding successful training trajectories. Ornith reports that its 397B model scored 86.1 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and 56.0 on DeepSWE, compared with 85.0 and 59.0 for Claude Opus 4.8. It scored 86.0 on SWE-bench Verified, 92.8 on GPQA Diamond, and 80.0 on MCP-Atlas. The 35B MoE model activates 3B parameters per token and scored 68.5 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 using Claude Code and 79.0 on SWE-bench Verified. The 9B model scored 47.0 and 70.6 on those benchmarks, respectively; Ornith says its quantized Mobile version can run on iPhone and Android devices. Ornith reports that its benchmark results are averaged over five independent runs.

ornith.ai

πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯

11 min

12h ago

Ornith-1.5: From Self-Scaffolding to Self-Improvement

Ornith introduced Ornith-1.5, a family of 397B-parameter mixture-of-experts (MoE), 35B MoE, and 9B dense models trained through a self-improvement loop. The system generates progressively harder tasks, creates task-specific scaffolds containing instructions, tools, decomposition, and orchestration, then produces reinforcement-learning rollouts. Rewards optimize task generation, scaffold construction, and solutions jointly using validity, frontier difficulty, novelty, solution quality, and resistance to reward hacking. The target task success rate is 0.2, favoring problems difficult enough to expose capability gaps while still yielding successful training trajectories. Ornith reports that its 397B model scored 86.1 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and 56.0 on DeepSWE, compared with 85.0 and 59.0 for Claude Opus 4.8. It scored 86.0 on SWE-bench Verified, 92.8 on GPQA Diamond, and 80.0 on MCP-Atlas. The 35B MoE model activates 3B parameters per token and scored 68.5 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 using Claude Code and 79.0 on SWE-bench Verified. The 9B model scored 47.0 and 70.6 on those benchmarks, respectively; Ornith says its quantized Mobile version can run on iPhone and Android devices. Ornith reports that its benchmark results are averaged over five independent runs.

ornith.ai

πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯

11 min

12h ago

No more articles to load