I'm going back to writing code by hand
blog.k10s.dev
May 11, 2026
14 min read
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
75/100
Summary
The author returns to writing code by hand after exploring the limits of software development without direct involvement. Key insights include the comparison of "em-dash" in AI writing to "god-object" in AI coding and the concept of vibe-coding enhancing the development process.
Key Takeaways
- AI can generate features quickly, but it struggles with creating coherent architecture, leading to potential project collapse.
- The author experienced initial success with AI-driven coding but ultimately found that human intervention was necessary for meaningful software development.
- Relying solely on AI for coding can result in disorganized and bloated code, referred to as "god-object" syndrome.
- The author is archiving their TUI tool and rewriting it from scratch after realizing the limitations of vibe-coding without proper oversight.
Coverage & discussions
Hacker News · blog.k10s.dev
Community discussions
Hacker News discussion ↗
Historical count: 5 · 5 saved in sample · Historical sample
Analysis ready
Community Sentiment
Positives
- AI tools can effectively explain complex code architectures, aiding developers in understanding messy codebases, which is crucial for successful refactoring.
- The approach of designing interfaces and ownership rules before coding can lead to more coherent and manageable code, emphasizing the importance of architecture in software development.
Concerns
- AI often proves to be ineffective in practical coding scenarios, as it can generate solutions that introduce more complexity and debugging challenges.
- Relying solely on AI for code generation can lead to a lack of understanding of the underlying architecture, resulting in issues that are difficult to trace and fix.
