I was wrong about the Midjourney ultra-sound scanner
twitter.com
June 21, 2026
2 min read
49/100
Summary
I was wrong about the Midjourney ultra-sound scanner. Well, maybe not wrong, but at a minimum I missed something obvious because I was thinking like a doctor who's been practicing for 25 years. And I didn't explain my point well. First, where I was wrong: All historical precendent that showed that widespread screening imaging is net neutral or harmful was imaging that was expensive, inconvenient, ...
Coverage & discussions
Hacker News · twitter.com
Community discussions
Historical count: 5 · 5 saved in sample · Historical sample
Analysis ready
Community Sentiment
Positives
- Any genuine attempt to create novel medical technologies is probably a good thing, as innovation in healthcare can lead to significant improvements in patient outcomes.
- The ambition behind developing new diagnostic tools like the Midjourney ultrasound scanner is commendable, as it reflects a desire to push the boundaries of medical technology.
Concerns
- Concerns about the credibility of Midjourney's ultrasound scanner arise from its lack of established medical validation, which could undermine trust in its effectiveness.
- Skepticism exists regarding the actual cost and accessibility of the scanner, as historical trends suggest that innovative medical technologies often become prohibitively expensive for patients.
Related Articles

Refuse to let your doctor record you
Apr 24, 2026

Alternatives to Animal Testing Are Finally Taking Off
Oct 19, 2026

OpenAI discloses four more rogue incidents
Oct 17, 2026
New Withings Users Must Pay $99/Year for Apple Health Syncing
Oct 15, 2026

The brain may be about to have its Ozempic moment
Aug 26, 2026