I Will Never Use AI to Code
antman-does-software.com
May 9, 2026
12 min read
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
46/100
Summary
The author expresses a strong opposition to using AI for coding and writing tasks. This stance is rooted in a belief that AI usage may not align with an ideal economic paradigm.
Key Takeaways
- The author enjoys coding and writing, believing that using AI for these tasks diminishes personal enjoyment and creativity.
- AI does not facilitate true skill development; it provides superficial knowledge without fostering deep understanding or practical application.
- Relying on AI can lead to skill decay and an inability to critically assess the quality of AI-generated work.
- The prevalence of AI tools in creative fields results in homogenized outputs, as individuals miss out on learning fundamental skills and constraints.
Community Sentiment
Positives
- Using AI for coding significantly reduces repetitive tasks, enhancing developer ergonomics and allowing programmers to focus on problem-solving instead of boilerplate code.
- AI coding tools can produce results that are satisfactory enough for developers to commit code confidently, as they can easily judge the output.
- The analogy of power tools in woodworking highlights how AI can improve efficiency and quality in coding, similar to how electric tools enhance woodworking.
Concerns
- Some users express skepticism about the effectiveness of AI in coding, believing it does not provide real benefits and may lead to a decline in coding skills.
- Concerns about the dependency on AI tools are raised, particularly regarding the potential for increased costs and limitations on usage due to token systems.
- The discourse around AI coding reveals a divide, with some individuals holding extreme views that may hinder productive discussions about its actual utility.
