The people who actually want AI to replace humanity

vox.com
May 31, 2026
32 min read
48/100
Summary
“I want AI to be a tool that allows human flourishing!” exclaimed Brad Carson, a former member of Congress. “There is an option out there where AI is just a tool for us.” The people who actually want AI to replace humanity We need to create a new humanism before the “AI successionists” win. This is a normal thing to say in most circles. But Carson was speaking at an invite-only symposium dedicated...
Coverage & discussions
Hacker News · vox.com
Community discussions
Community Sentiment
Positives
- The argument for AI as a potential moral superior raises important questions about human morality's limitations, suggesting that AI could address global challenges more effectively.
- The idea of creating a benevolent dictator for humanity through AI could be seen as a pragmatic solution, especially if human leadership is deemed inadequate.
Concerns
- Concerns about AI's moral framework highlight the risk that a 'superior' morality could be incomprehensible or even disturbing to humans, raising ethical dilemmas.
- The fear that AI could replace human labor entirely without adequate social structures like UBI indicates a troubling future where economic stability is jeopardized.
Related Articles

No-One Escapes the Permanent Underclass
Jun 26, 2026

Mythologizing AI makes it more likely that we’ll fail to operate it well (2023)
Jul 20, 2026

Superintelligence: The Idea That Eats Smart People (2016)
Jun 1, 2026

The Future Worth Building Is Human
Jul 14, 2026

I'm glad the Anthropic fight is happening now
Mar 11, 2026