When online commenters detect my art as AI
davidrevoy.com
August 5, 2026
1 min read
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
52/100
Summary
Online commenters frequently misidentify hand-drawn artworks as AI-generated across various platforms, including Reddit, YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook. The creator has compiled a collection of these comments, which has inspired a weekly comic series addressing the issue.
Key Takeaways
- Online commenters frequently accuse the artist David Revoy of using AI to create his hand-drawn art, despite evidence to the contrary.
- Revoy compiled a collection of comments from various platforms expressing confusion about the authenticity of his work.
- The artist highlights the ongoing issue of artists being misidentified as AI creators, which complicates perceptions of authenticity in art.
- Revoy's art has been used as training data for AI image generation without his consent, raising concerns about copyright and artist rights.
Coverage & discussions
Hacker News · davidrevoy.com
Community discussions
Hacker News discussion ↗
Historical count: 5 · 5 saved in sample · Historical sample
Analysis ready
Community Sentiment
Positives
- The artist's works are described as lovely and detailed, showcasing great care in their creation.
- Mad respect for the artist sharing full res Krita files; it's a refreshing move in a world wary of AI-generated content.
- The artist has a notable background, contributing to Krita and being well-known in the art community, which adds credibility.
Concerns
- Some commenters feel the artist's work is 'middle of the road,' indicating a lack of distinctiveness that could be confused with AI outputs.
- There's a sense of frustration over the lack of research by some commenters, suggesting a broader issue of tech literacy and understanding of artistic merit in the age of AI.
