Story
Charlie Stross – On the non-use of AI in my writing process
1 report
1 website
1 discussion
Latest report
Overview
Generative large language models (LLMs) are not used in the writing process. The author emphasizes a preference for original work over AI-generated content and criticizes the commercialization of LLMs.
Summary from antipope.org.
Reports
One report so far. Additional coverage will appear here when it is linked to this story.
Community reactions
Each reaction summarizes sampled comments from the linked discussion.
Hacker News · antipope.org
Hacker News discussion ↗
Historical count: 5 · 5 saved in sample · Historical sample
Analysis ready
Read this discussion’s reaction
Based on 5 sampled comments from this thread. Analyzed 2026-08-01.
- Praise: There's a real desire for locally-run AI tools that can help authors plan and edit their manuscripts without the cloud's complications — a sign of growing autonomy in the writing process.
- Praise: Commenters are excited about the potential for AI to assist in scene mapping and character tracking, showcasing a clear interest in blending technology with creative writing.
- Concern: The article's technical inaccuracies about AI, like misattributing GANs to LLMs, really undermine the author's credibility and reflect a lack of understanding of the technology.
- Concern: Many commenters feel that dismissive critiques of AI in writing are just 'pablum' — a sign that the debate is becoming polarized and often misses nuanced perspectives.
- Concern: There's a strong sense of skepticism regarding the author's perspective, with users questioning whether his views align with the realities of modern AI capabilities in creative fields.