A court ruled that asking ChatGPT whether something is considered Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) does not constitute a proper legal process and violates the First Amendment. The case involved DOGE bros Justin Fox and Nate Cavanaugh, who were tasked with eliminating perceived "woke" elements despite lacking relevant experience.

In the case of US v. Heppner, the court ruled that communications involving AI chat tools do not qualify for attorney-client privilege. This decision establishes that interactions with AI systems can be subject to disclosure in legal proceedings.

U.S. lawyers are advising clients against treating AI chatbots as confidential sources, especially in legal matters, due to a recent ruling where a judge allowed AI chats to be used as evidence in a securities fraud case. This ruling raises concerns about the potential legal implications of sharing sensitive information with AI systems.

An Ohio man, James Strahler II, became the first person convicted under a new federal AI statute for cybercrimes involving real and AI-generated sexually explicit images. He pleaded guilty to charges including cyberstalking, producing obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse, and publishing digital forgeries, with the last charge related to the Take It Down Act.

The US Supreme Court has declined to review a ruling that prohibits copyright protection for AI-generated art. This decision follows an appeal by computer scientist Stephen Thaler regarding the copyright status of art created by artificial intelligence.

India's Supreme Court is considering legal consequences after a junior judge used fake AI-generated orders in a property dispute case. The court described the situation as a matter of "institutional concern" and will review the lower court's ruling from Andhra Pradesh.