4TB of voice samples just stolen from 40k AI contractors at Mercor

app.oravys.com
April 27, 2026
6 min read
69/100
Summary
4TB of voice samples from 40,000 AI contractors were stolen and posted by the extortion group Lapsus$ on April 4, 2026. The leaked data includes voice biometrics linked to government-issued identity documents, raising concerns about potential misuse.
Key Takeaways
- 4TB of voice samples from 40,000 AI contractors were stolen by the extortion group Lapsus$ and posted on their leak site on April 4, 2026.
- The breach combines voice biometrics with government-issued identity documents, enabling potential misuse for identity theft and fraud.
- Attackers can use the stolen data for various malicious activities, including bypassing bank verification, committing vishing scams, and executing deepfake video calls.
- Individuals who uploaded voice samples to Mercor should treat their voice data as compromised and take steps to protect their identity.
Coverage & discussions
Hacker News · app.oravys.com
Community discussions
Historical count: 5 · 5 saved in sample · Historical sample
Analysis ready
Community Sentiment
Positives
- The offer from ORAVYS to analyze suspect voice samples for free highlights a proactive approach to addressing potential misuse of AI-generated voice data.
- The discussion around 'Datensparsamkeit' emphasizes the importance of data minimization, which is crucial for protecting individual privacy in AI applications.
- Concerns about the origins of training data for text-to-speech models could lead to greater transparency and ethical standards in AI development.
Concerns
- The situation with Mercor contractors reveals a troubling pattern of consent manipulation, raising serious ethical concerns about how AI companies handle personal data.
- The reliance on biometrics as a form of identification is increasingly seen as a liability, especially when users are unaware of the permanence of their data.
- The lack of clarity regarding the training data for current text-to-speech models suggests a significant gap in ethical AI practices, potentially undermining trust in the technology.
Related Articles

The Three-Second Theft: Why AI Voice Fraud Outruns Every Defence
Jul 15, 2026

A hacker broke into John Deere and SharkNinja with an army of AI agents
Oct 19, 2026

Plex vulnerabilities being exploited in the wild to drop a cryptominer
Oct 19, 2026

Big Fish: Exploiting a 37-Year-Old Kernel Bug in OpenBSD
Oct 16, 2026

RPKI now protects 70% of internet routes
Oct 16, 2026