ArXiv to Ban Researchers for a Year if They Submit AI Slop

404media.co
June 8, 2026
1 min read
39/100
Summary
ArXiv will impose a one-year ban on authors who submit papers containing obviously AI-generated content that includes inappropriate language, plagiarism, bias, or errors. Thomas Dietterich, chair of the computer science section at ArXiv, stated that authors are responsible for the inclusion of such outputs in their work.
Key Takeaways
- ArXiv will impose a one-year ban on authors who submit papers containing obviously AI-generated content that includes errors, plagiarism, or misleading information.
- Authors are responsible for verifying the accuracy of generative AI outputs included in their submissions to ArXiv.
- Incontrovertible evidence of unchecked AI-generated results, such as hallucinated references, will lead to penalties for authors.
- After a ban, authors must have their subsequent submissions accepted by a reputable peer-reviewed venue before submitting to ArXiv.
Coverage & discussions
Reddit r/artificial · 404media.co
Community discussions
Related Articles

Why We're Banning AI
Oct 15, 2026

Judge relying wholly on AI in order is covered by judicial immunity, court rules
Aug 17, 2026

Why My Father Is Wrong: A Defense of Guitar Hero
Aug 11, 2026

Charlie Stross – On the non-use of AI in my writing process
Aug 1, 2026

The early hiring funnel is now breaking on both ends
Jun 21, 2026