I told people I'm a convicted felon after 20 years of hiding it

buford.bg
October 21, 2026
6 min read
47/100
Summary
Buford Taylor, who writes science fiction as Leonard Buford, is building three companies while writing a new novel and an autobiography. He says he has started or joined 17 early-stage companies since 2007, most of which shut down. His current businesses include Casting Call Club, a casting marketplace for voice actors, producers and directors with 2 million users; Closing Credits, an education and community platform for creators; and SHO, a testimonial-collection and embedding service started in October 2024. Taylor was engineer number three at Eventbrite, where he says revenue grew from $4 million to $700 million during his four years there. He later joined Reforge as founding engineer; the company raised $20 million from Andreessen Horowitz. He says Closing Credits reached about $50,000 in monthly recurring revenue in January 2022. Taylor is writing Sol Truckers, about a missing Earth and interplanetary war, and Buford versus Oklahoma, an autobiography covering prison, homelessness, addiction and entrepreneurship. His Nouscraft LitRPG trilogy has sold more than 10,000 copies and averages 4.5 stars on Amazon and Goodreads. Taylor says he uses no AI in his prose but uses AI for most coding, while reviewing all AI-generated code. He argues that writing manually remains necessary for sustained, deep thinking.
Key Takeaways
- Buford Taylor runs Casting Call Club, Closing Credits and SHO while writing fiction under the name Leonard Buford.
- Casting Call Club serves voice actors, producers and directors and has 2 million users, according to Taylor.
- Taylor says he uses AI for most of his coding but does not use AI in his prose and reviews AI-generated code.
- The Nouscraft trilogy has sold more than 10,000 copies and averages 4.5 stars across Amazon and Goodreads, according to Taylor.
- Taylor says he was Eventbrite's third engineer and that the company grew from $4 million to $700 million during his four years there.
What the discussion said
The discussion contains almost no substantive AI or machine-learning reaction. One reader noticed that the personal site appeared to use the same visual or technical approach associated with an OpenAI promotional site, and another responded that its presentation looked AI-generated. Neither comment developed that observation into a claim about model quality, AI-assisted authorship, safety, training data, or the value of an AI product. Instead, the thread overwhelmingly focused on the author’s undisclosed conviction, the apparent severity of the offense, whether the memoir conveyed remorse, and how criminal records constrain employment and housing after release. Some readers argued that a justice system should make rehabilitation practical rather than trap people in desperation; others stressed public protection and questioned whether the author’s framing earned sympathy. Those are social and criminal-justice arguments, not AI/ML ones. Comments about intrusive website sounds, bandwidth behavior, and clickbait likewise concern ordinary web design rather than AI functionality. As a result, there is no meaningful community consensus, dispute, praise, or criticism about AI to extract from this material.
Coverage & discussions
Hacker News · buford.bg
Community discussions
Related Articles

Building from zero after addiction, prison, and a felony
Jun 7, 2026

This July I Was Fired from Simple AI (A Deeply YC Company)
Jul 26, 2026

AI demands more engineering discipline. Not less
Jun 17, 2026

Vibe coding and agentic engineering are getting closer than I'd like
May 6, 2026

My old job feels distant now
Oct 16, 2026