chatbots ai-regulation healthcare-ai legal-ai

New York could prohibit chatbot medical, legal, engineering advice

New York Could Prohibit Chatbot Advice on Medical, Legal, and Engineering Questions

folding-sky.com

March 4, 2026

9 min read

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

47/100

Summary

New York's Senate Bill S7263 would impose civil liability on chatbot operators for providing substantive advice in 14 licensed professions, including medicine, law, and engineering. This regulation aims to protect consumers by holding AI systems accountable for potentially harmful advice in these fields.

Key Takeaways

Senate Bill S7263 in New York would hold chatbot operators liable for providing substantive advice in 14 licensed professions, including medicine, law, and engineering.
The bill prohibits chatbots from giving any advice that would constitute a crime if done by a natural person, effectively banning licensed professional guidance without proper credentials.
If passed, chatbot deployers will have 90 days to comply with the new liability regulations after the bill is signed into law.
The definition of "proprietor" in the bill includes any entity that operates a chatbot, impacting a wide range of organizations from startups to government agencies.

Read original article

View story →

Coverage & discussions

Hacker News · folding-sky.com

New York could prohibit chatbot medical, legal, engineering advice ↗

Community discussions

Hacker News discussion ↗

Historical count: 5 · 5 saved in sample · Historical sample

Analysis ready

Community Sentiment

Mixed

Positives

AI has the potential to empower individuals against corporations, providing accessible information that can help them navigate complex legal and medical situations.
The requirement for responsible disclosure could enhance user awareness, allowing individuals to make informed decisions based on AI-generated advice.

Concerns

Prohibiting AI from providing advice altogether is seen as an absurd overreach that limits the benefits AI can offer to users seeking guidance.
The law's disclaimer requirements are viewed as ineffective and humorous, suggesting that they may not genuinely protect users or improve AI interactions.