Themata.AI
Themata.AI

Popular tags:

#developer-tools#ai-agents#discussion#trending#llms#ai-ethics#claude#code-generation#ai-safety#openai

AI is changing the world. Don't stay behind. Clear summaries, community insight, delivered without the noise. Subscribe to never miss a beat.

© 2026 Themata.AI • All Rights Reserved

Archive

|

Topics

|

Privacy

|

Cookies

|

Contact
← All stories

Story

Don't ask an LLM for a confidence score

1 report

1 website

1 discussion

Latest report

Overview

LLM confidence scores often misrepresent the certainty of generated outputs. Relying on these scores can lead to misunderstandings about the reliability of AI responses.

Summary from justinflick.com.

Reports

One report so far. Additional coverage will appear here when it is linked to this story.

  1. justinflick.com

    Don't ask an LLM for a confidence score

    Read report →

Community reactions

Each reaction summarizes sampled comments from the linked discussion.

Hacker News · justinflick.com

Don't ask an LLM for a confidence score ↗
Hacker News discussion ↗

Historical count: 5 · 5 saved in sample · Historical sample

Analysis ready

Read this discussion’s reaction

Based on 5 sampled comments from this thread. Analyzed 2026-07-28.

  • Praise: With the right prompting strategy, LLMs can verbalize probabilities that are better calibrated than their own estimates, which opens up new avenues for better decision-making.
  • Praise: For many applications, like finance, high or low confidence scores have proven to be accurate about 90% of the time, making them practically useful despite some edge cases.
  • Concern: The claim that asking LLMs for confidence scores is completely useless is overly strong, especially when research shows they can be useful under certain conditions.
  • Concern: Models often lack a good sense of their own capabilities, leading to unreliable self-assessments when asked about the meaningfulness of their outputs.