I am happier writing code by hand
abhinavomprakash.com
February 8, 2026
4 min read
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
65/100
Summary
Writing code by hand can lead to greater satisfaction and joy in the coding process. Frequent use of AI tools like Claude Code may result in feelings of depression and lethargy, prompting some users to return to traditional coding methods.
Key Takeaways
- Writing code by hand helps internalize the problem domain and enhances understanding, making it easier to verify correctness.
- Relying on LLMs for code generation can lead to a passive mindset and hinder deep thinking, which is essential for effective software engineering.
- Using LLMs in a controlled manner, such as providing context manually, maintains engagement and preserves the joy of coding.
- Prioritizing happiness in work is crucial; productivity gains from LLMs may not outweigh the negative emotional impacts they can cause.
Community Sentiment
Positives
- Using AI for repetitive tasks, like converting SQL DDL to Rust structs, significantly speeds up development and enhances productivity, allowing developers to focus on more complex challenges.
- The process of coding by hand fosters a deeper understanding of projects, which can lead to faster delivery of features in the long run, showcasing the value of traditional coding methods.
Concerns
- Relying too much on AI tools can lead to a loss of control over code quality, as developers may become overly dependent on 'hopes and dreams' rather than solid coding practices.
- If the industry shifts towards AI-driven coding, those who prefer traditional hand-coding may find themselves at a disadvantage, potentially relegated to hobbyist status.
