I won't read LLM authored fiction
mccormick.cx
August 7, 2026
2 min read
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
46/100
Summary
Reading fiction enhances critical thinking and emotional engagement, which can improve personal writing quality. Engaging with fiction written by humans offers a unique statistical perspective that differs from AI-generated content.
Key Takeaways
- Fiction reading enhances creativity and writing quality by influencing a writer's statistical profile through exposure to diverse word choices.
- The author prefers human-written fiction because LLM-generated text tends to reflect a statistically normal writing style, which they find unappealing for creative reading.
- The emotional and creative depth of fiction is perceived to be stronger than that of non-fiction, which is often more conventional and less expressive.
- The author desires assurance that contemporary fiction is authored by humans rather than LLMs to maintain the authenticity of the reading experience.
Community Sentiment
Positives
- Some commenters appreciate the diverse ways art can be experienced, suggesting that LLM-generated content could be enjoyed if approached from a different perspective.
- One user highlights that AI-generated music can sometimes surpass human creations, hinting at a major shift in the music industry where AI might redefine quality.
Concerns
- Many commenters express a strong aversion to LLM-generated fiction, stating that art loses its magic without a human creator behind it, as it's the life experiences that give music and stories depth.
- There's a fear of entering a literary dark age, with concerns that LLMs may overshadow budding authors and dilute the quality of new literature.
- A recurring sentiment is that LLMs 'steal' from human artists, leading to a lack of originality and a homogenized output that many find uninteresting or uninspired.