Judge rules DOGE cancellation of humanities grants was unconstitutional
apnews.com
May 8, 2026
4 min read
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
46/100
Summary
A federal judge in New York ruled that the Trump administration's cancellation of over $100 million in humanities grants was unconstitutional. The judge determined that the Department of Government Efficiency lacked the authority to terminate the funding.
Key Takeaways
- A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration's cancellation of over $100 million in humanities grants was unconstitutional and lacked lawful authority.
- The judge criticized the use of artificial intelligence by the Department of Government Efficiency to target grants for cancellation based on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) criteria.
- The ruling emphasized that the government violated the First Amendment and the Fifth Amendment's equal protection rights by engaging in viewpoint discrimination.
- Several organizations, including The Authors Guild and the American Historical Association, celebrated the decision as a significant victory for the humanities and constitutional rights.
Related Articles
DOGE canceled NC Museum grant for HVAC systems after ChatGPT flagged it as DEI
Mar 18, 2026
Court to DOGE: Asking ChatGPT 'Is This DEI?' Is Not Proper Legal Process
May 8, 2026
DOGE Bro's Grant Review Process Was Literally Just Asking ChatGPT 'Is This DEI?'
Feb 19, 2026
The federal keyword lists that canceled billions in research funding
Aug 17, 2026