The case for overhauling American science
economist.com
August 14, 2026
1 min read
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
44/100
Summary
Michael Kratsios advocates for an overhaul of American science to leverage AI and enhance competitiveness against China. He references the historical context of Vannevar Bush's report, "Science: The Endless Frontier," which shaped government support for basic science in the U.S.
Key Takeaways
- The American scientific enterprise needs an overhaul to effectively harness AI and compete with China.
- Vannevar Bush's report, "Science: The Endless Frontier," laid the foundation for government support of basic science and led to the establishment of the National Science Foundation (NSF).
- The triumphal attitude towards science and technology significantly shaped the "American Century."
Community Sentiment
Positives
- The proposal is seen as thoughtful in diagnosing the problems of the current system, sparking discussion about the need for direct funding to researchers.
Concerns
- Commenters are skeptical that simply disbursing money to researchers will escape the same pitfalls of corruption and ideological bias as the current funding model.
- Many see the focus on out-competing China as misguided, arguing that outsourcing R&D could lead to a loss of jobs and innovation in the US.
- There's a strong sentiment that the current administration's approach to science funding is more about political maneuvering than genuine support for scientific advancement.
