![US v. Heppner (S.D.N.Y. 2026) no attorney-client privilege for AI chats [pdf]](https://pub-90f0ac00d93c47daac3e1d2cdd28d496.r2.dev/articles/3b2d8d01b7e372f04e4db70046ea5740.webp)
US v. Heppner (S.D.N.Y. 2026) no attorney-client privilege for AI chats [pdf]
In the case of US v. Heppner, the court ruled that communications involving AI chat tools do not qualify for attorney-client privilege. This decision establishes that interactions with AI systems can be subject to disclosure in legal proceedings.
fingfx.thomsonreuters.com
1 min
9h ago
US v. Heppner (S.D.N.Y. 2026) no attorney-client privilege for AI chats [pdf]
In the case of US v. Heppner, the court ruled that communications involving AI chat tools do not qualify for attorney-client privilege. This decision establishes that interactions with AI systems can be subject to disclosure in legal proceedings.
fingfx.thomsonreuters.com
1 min
9h ago
US v. Heppner (S.D.N.Y. 2026) no attorney-client privilege for AI chats [pdf]
In the case of US v. Heppner, the court ruled that communications involving AI chat tools do not qualify for attorney-client privilege. This decision establishes that interactions with AI systems can be subject to disclosure in legal proceedings.
fingfx.thomsonreuters.com
1 min
9h ago
No more articles to load