Themata.AI
Follow coverage
Themata.AI
Glm 5LLMsAI performanceModel analysis

Report · artificialanalysis.ai

GLM 5.2 Performance Benchmarks

GLM-5.2 (max) - Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis

artificialanalysis.ai

Source published June 17, 2026

Summary: 1 min read

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

55/100

Summary

GLM-5.2 (max) is a leading model in intelligence with a score of 51 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. It offers a 1 million token context window, supports text input and output, is faster than average, but is considered expensive compared to other open weight models of similar size.

Key Takeaways

  • GLM-5.2 (max) scores 51 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, significantly above the average score of 24 for comparable models.
  • The pricing for GLM-5.2 (max) is $1.40 per 1M input tokens and $4.40 per 1M output tokens, making it more expensive than the average prices of $0.42 and $1.25, respectively.
  • GLM-5.2 (max) generates output at a speed of 108 tokens per second, which is faster than the average speed of 60 tokens per second for similar models.
  • The model has a context window of 1 million tokens, allowing for extensive text input and output capabilities.
Read original article

Coverage & discussions

Hacker News · artificialanalysis.ai

GLM 5.2 Performance Benchmarks ↗

Community discussions

Hacker News discussion ↗

Historical count: 5 · 5 saved in sample · Historical sample

Analysis ready

Community Sentiment

Mixed

Positives

  • GLM 5.2 excels in the 'AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate', outperforming models like DeepSeek and GPT 5.5, which highlights its reliability in uncertain scenarios.
  • The model's performance improvements, being 30% faster than its predecessor, indicate significant advancements in efficiency that could enhance user experience.
  • Local models are becoming increasingly useful, suggesting a shift towards more accessible AI solutions that could democratize technology for a wider audience.

Concerns

  • Concerns arise over the validity of the 'AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate' benchmark, as it seems to favor models that avoid complex reasoning, potentially misleading users about true performance.
  • Skepticism about the benchmarks is prevalent, especially when models like Muse Spark are rated higher than GPT-5.5, raising doubts about the accuracy of the evaluations.
  • The high costs associated with deploying these models on local hardware may hinder accessibility, limiting their practical use for many developers and organizations.

Related Articles

GLM-5.3 (max) - Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis

GLM-5.3 Artificial Analysis Benchmarks

Aug 18, 2026

GLM-5.3-Flash - Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis | Artificial Analysis

GLM-5.3-Flash Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis

Aug 26, 2026

GLM-5.2 is the new leading open weights model on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

GLM-5.2 is the new leading open weights model on Artificial Analysis

Jun 17, 2026

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (max) - Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis | Artificial Analysis

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)

Oct 19, 2026

Comparison of AI Models across Intelligence, Performance, and Price

Opus 5 is currently #1 on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Leaderboard

Jul 24, 2026