Themata.AI
Themata.AI

Popular tags:

#developer-tools#ai-agents#llms#ai-ethics#claude#code-generation#openai#ai-safety#anthropic#open-source

AI is changing the world. Don't stay behind. Clear summaries, community insight, delivered without the noise. Subscribe to never miss a beat.

© 2026 Themata.AI • All Rights Reserved

Privacy

|

Cookies

|

Contact
ai-agentsmalware-detectionreverse-engineeringdeveloper-tools

We hid backdoors in ~40MB binaries and asked AI + Ghidra to find them

We hid backdoors in ~40MB binaries and asked AI + Ghidra to find them - Quesma Blog

quesma.com

February 22, 2026

14 min read

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

60/100

Summary

Backdoors were hidden in ~40MB binaries to test AI and Ghidra's capabilities in malware detection. The experiment involved collaboration with Michał “Redford” Kowalczyk, a reverse engineering expert, to establish a benchmark for identifying malicious code in binaries.

Key Takeaways

  • AI agents, including Claude Opus 4.6, can detect hidden backdoors in binary executables, achieving a 49% success rate on small to mid-sized binaries.
  • Most AI models used for malware detection exhibit a high false positive rate, incorrectly flagging clean binaries as malicious.
  • The analysis of binary executables is complex due to the loss of original code structure during compilation, making reverse engineering a challenging task.
  • Recent supply chain attacks highlight the vulnerabilities in digital devices and firmware, underscoring the need for effective malware detection methods.
Read original article

Community Sentiment

Mixed

Positives

  • Ghidra proves to be an effective tool for reverse engineering, enabling tasks that were previously daunting without LLM assistance, showcasing its potential in file format analysis.
  • The latest AI models show promise in reverse engineering tasks, indicating a shift towards more capable tools for legacy binary analysis and internal audits.
  • The ability of Claude Opus 4.6 to detect 46% of backdoors, despite a higher false positive rate, highlights the advancements in AI detection capabilities.

Concerns

  • The claim that AI can replicate skilled reverse engineering work on unobfuscated binaries is limited, as it does not account for the complexities introduced by obfuscation.
  • Relying on AI for security audits is questionable, as current models may not yet meet the rigorous demands of identifying sophisticated threats effectively.
  • The low detection rates of models like GPT, despite a 0% false positive rate, suggest that while they are precise, their overall effectiveness in identifying backdoors remains inadequate.

Related Articles

Evaluating and mitigating the growing risk of LLM-discovered 0-days

Evaluating and mitigating the growing risk of LLM-discovered 0-days

Feb 5, 2026

Anthropic's newest AI model uncovered 500 zero-day software flaws in testing

Opus 4.6 uncovers 500 zero-day flaws in open-source code

Feb 5, 2026

Detecting and preventing distillation attacks

Detecting and Preventing Distillation Attacks

Feb 23, 2026

The looming AI clownpocalypse · honnibal.dev

The Looming AI Clownpocalypse

Mar 2, 2026

Vulnerability Research Is Cooked

Vulnerability research is cooked

Mar 30, 2026